Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dario Floreano


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. John254 02:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Dario Floreano

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Apparently non-notable scientist; fails WP:PROF/WP:BIO due to a lack of substantial coverage in reliable third-party sources. See also the related Articles for deletion/Non-notable EPFL robots. Sandstein (talk) 00:04, 28 November 2007 (UTC) Withdrawn per David. Sandstein (talk) 06:09, 29 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete: NN.  Google news only brings back articles with mentions of the name. - Rjd0060 (talk) 00:12, 28 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions.  -- Pete.Hurd (talk) 05:08, 28 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep. Academics can be notable for their appearance in the popular press, but more often are notable for their academic achievements. Floreano has quite a respectable publication and citation record. For some third-party publications specifically about Floreano's work, see e.g. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; etc. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:29, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as per David Eppstein. In addition, Floreano is on the Editorial Boards of 8 journals, a good indication that his peers find him notable in his field. Both Web of Science and Google Scholar list many publications, with reasonable (WoS) to very good (GS) citation rates. --Crusio (talk) 08:00, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as per David Eppstein. -- ¿Amar៛ Talk to me / My edits 11:01, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Featured in important journals. Rama (talk) 12:57, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - per David Eppstein and Crusio. This looks like a serious academic to me, with solid publication record, employment at a top University, and with impact outside academia, to boot. Turgidson (talk) 00:29, 29 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.