Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DarkBASIC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Game Creators. Nothing sourced to merge, but feel free to take from the page history. czar 03:37, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

DarkBASIC

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No third-party references since creation in 2004, promotional tone, defunct software so new RSes very unlikely. I PRODed it, an IP removed the PROD without addressing any of the issues. Disconcertingly, I'm having trouble finding even unreliable sources that aren't primary, let alone reliable ones. The related article DarkBASIC Professional is also at AFD. David Gerard (talk) 08:30, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 08:37, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 08:37, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment Should be merged into article The Game Creators, see Draft:The Game Creators. Jonpatterns (talk) 10:58, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * So far that draft is similarly short on RSes ... but yeah, that would be a good place - David Gerard (talk) 12:06, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I think there is enough sources for one article covering The Game Creators and their products. It would take a bit of work to put together though. Jonpatterns (talk) 14:18, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Nothing stopping you copying these into the draft while digesting them :-) - David Gerard (talk) 18:52, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:13, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge into The Game Creators if the studio is notable enough for an article, otherwise Delete.--ZXCVBNM (TALK) 23:36, 25 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.