Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DarkPlaces


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  delete. Jayjg (talk) 03:43, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

DarkPlaces

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Game mod which cannot be verified through reliable independent sources, and by extension does not pass our notability guidelines for inclusion. (WP:V, WP:N)Marasmusine (talk) 09:24, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions.  Marasmusine (talk) 09:25, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - the best I could find were three very trivial mentions using the Google Scholar search. No reliable sources to speak of on the web, and any moderately reliable ones I found were trivial mentions of DarkPlaces as the Nexuiz engine.  Not enough to satisfy WP:N unfortunately. --Teancum (talk) 14:18, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete mods are almost never notable enough for articles, and nothing about this one indicates it's any sort of exception. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  17:11, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 20:20, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep highly-important mods upon which several other mods, total conversions, and full games have been based on. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 23:10, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Can you point to any published material to back this up? Marasmusine (talk) 08:33, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.