Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark Intervals (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Shimeru (talk) 23:08, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Dark Intervals
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unsourced orphan article on an album, no indication of significance. Guy (Help!) 12:56, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep While the article itself is as yet insubstantial, it sits inside Category:Keith Jarrett albums and is also specifically discussed in the Keith Jarrett biographical article. The album itself is not non-notable and sources exist for improving the article, for example this Allmusic review. AllyD (talk) 13:53, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment The previous AfD for a "Dark Intervals" article is nothing to do with this album, but seems to have related to an entirely distinct film. AllyD (talk) 13:55, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Jazz notified. AllyD (talk) 13:59, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Bringing albums by clearly notable artists that have received significant coverage to AFD simply wastes time of others. a Google search quickly found an Allmusic review and a Spokane Chronicle article. A Google Books search shows further coverage.--Michig (talk) 14:05, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets the notability criteria as an officially released album of a notable artist, and as Michig points out coverage is indeed available. Being unsourced and orphaned are surmountable problems, not reasons for deletion. Jafeluv (talk) 16:30, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. Silver  seren C 07:16, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment I have tagged this article for rescue. Silver  seren C 07:16, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep I had added the sources given above, along with some other German and Italian ones. Almost all of Jarrett's works become instantly notable, just with the coverage they each get. He's just that famous. Silver  seren C 07:16, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:03, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - I've added a reception section and some in text references DISEman (talk) 02:15, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - as others have stated, the article needs (needed) expansion, not deletion. There must be a better process than this for drawing attention to a needy article. D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 14:52, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Always try to use Google news BEFORE nominating anything. The New York Times article at the top of the search proves it notable enough for an article.   D r e a m Focus  08:17, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: Keith Jarrett is notable. This sort of detail about one of his albums is one of the reasons people value Wikipedia. Jonathan Luckett (talk) 15:42, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.