Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark Knowledge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. El_C 09:29, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Dark Knowledge
A three sentence article that doesn't really say anything; what little it says is unsourced. Prod tag was disputed OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:42, 8 September 2006 (UTC) Some References to "Dark Knowledge" in theologies -- "Gregory P Rocca, OP, “The ‘Dark Knowledge of God’ and Our Worship of the Divine Mystery,” Nova et Vetera 3:4 (Fall 2005): 807-823. Aquinas’s theological epistemology of the divine names weaves together positive and negative theology in service of the liturgical language of worship. Such language is “iconic”: a mean between agnostic and idolatrous speech, balancing both true knowledge of God and insisting that it is also dark knowledge. Rocca analyzes various negative features of Aquinas theology, such as " http://72.14.209.104/search?q=cache:F24NgcXwakAJ:www.aquinas.avemaria.edu/Nova/PDF/Vol_3_4/Abstract.pdf+%22dark+knowledge%22&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=28 "The dark knowledge of God. JOURNET, Charles.   class: 231. Shelf: JOU. accession No: 41100.     tr. by James F. Anderson. Sheed & Ward, 1948. xiii, 122p.     GOD. Knowableness" http://www.catholic-library.org.uk/catalogue/search_results.php?action=find_subject&cur_page=0&find=GOD.%20Knowableness Critique -- One critique of "Dark Knowledge" is that is assumes that knowledge exists independently of sentient beings. However, people like Hume, Kant, Piaget, present arguments in favor of knowledge (such as causality) being a creation and belief of the mind.
 * Delete. Oh, I know what the article is about.  Though, we call it the unknown, things beyond the human capacity to understand, the absolute truth, etc.  Meh, I shouldn't have slept through my philosphy classes.  Delete per WP:NOT.  zephyr2k  23:24, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, the term exists. Took my philosophy in Filipino language so I know it using a different term.  But the article is still essentially a dicdef.  Not sure how this article can be expanded.  Any suggestions?  zephyr2k  02:51, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as dicdef, without possiblility of expansion. &mdash; Arthur Rubin | (talk) 20:59, 11 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.