Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark Prophecy: The Dawn of Tomorrow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete all.--Fuhghettaboutit 11:06, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Dark_Prophecy:_The_Dawn_of_Tomorrow

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Not an article about a real game in development; no links to gaming media sites, developers, publishers, and excess information unavailable at this stage of development (For example, ESRB rating). Tohya 18:21, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reasons:


 * Delete all of them as a non-notable game development, if not an outright hoax. I'm pretty sure that the PSP cover at Dark Prophecy: The Dawn of Tomorrow is actually a badly Photoshopped splash image from RPG Maker 2003, and I'm pretty sure Sharingan is a trademarked term by this point. Cheers, Lankybugger ○ Yell ○ 18:45, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment My memory rocks. Check out this image, which confirms my memories of the RPG Maker 2003 splash screen being correct. Cheers, Lankybugger ○ Yell ○ 00:21, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete All This looks like another good example of Wikipedia is not a crytal ball. The cover design for the boxes looks like fanart to me. Also, none of the articles are sourced properly, so even if the games are in production, there is no way to ascertain that from reading the articles and checking sources. -- Cy ru s      An dir on   [[Image:Flag_of_Indiana.svg|24px]] 18:52, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all Hoaxalicious. Perpetrator also made Koden, a fake anime. JuJube 01:23, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete This definitely appears to be a hoax, and the screenshot appears photoshopped. The article reads more of a wish list then anything else. Turlo Lomon 11:35, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.