Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark Tide: Siege


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. -Doc (?) 16:25, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

Dark Tide: Siege
Novel was actually never completed. It "was to have been" part of a trilogy; but it "isn't"; therefore it doesn't exist. Perhaps the info can be added to another article and this turned into a redirect. Your thoughts are appreciated. paul klenk talk 00:33, 7 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete - A non-existent novel doesn't merit an article. I agree with adding content to another article. Sunray 02:17, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, nonexistent. Gazpacho 02:20, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. --Dvyost 02:46, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Would be different if it were the lost novel of a great writer. -- SCZenz 02:53, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with New Jedi Order, possibly under a heading of "Cancelled Novels". The Knightfall Trilogy could also be merged into this section. Saberwyn 03:22, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, of interest to users. Kappa 06:44, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not just StarWarscruft, non-existent StarWarscruft. --Calton | Talk 07:33, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * lol. Delete per above. Dottore So 10:51, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, factual and informative. Hipocrite - &laquo; Talk &raquo; 13:36, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge to the series it was to have been art of. Rich Farmbrough 15:03, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to the series it would have been part of. --Cel e stianpower hablamé 15:51, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I think we should raise the inclusion bar very high for things that don't actually exist. Gamaliel 18:22, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per Gama. Very high indeed. Marskell 20:41, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator and Gamaliel. Quale 22:39, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep I disagree with the gut instinct to label unpublished novels non-encyclopedic. Just because something gets cancelled doesn't mean that people were unaware of it or uninterested in it. Now, in general, I question the need for every single New Jedi Order novel to have its own wikipedia article; but if that's the basis for deletion, then I argue for a Merge of all these novel stubs into the primary article. Justin Bacon 00:34, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge to the series article. Amren (talk) 13:50, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.