Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark flow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy keep Nominator has otherwise troublesome edits, so this may be a WP:POINTy nomination. Either way, WP:SNOW seems to be applying here. NAC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 22:30, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

dark flow
Apparantly, this article exists prematurely. YouthoNation (talk) 18:54, 28 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep - Perhaps its not a mature article, but there is a press release and a paper, and its by serious scientists with serious data. I think it should be kept and allowed to develop as new releases come out.Likebox (talk) 19:18, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - This is a recently discovered significant movement of not just one galaxy, not just one cluster of galaxies, but at least 700 clusters of galaxies. The scientific work has been noted as important by many reputable sources. WAS 4.250 (talk) 19:22, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - It has references, and seems to be an emerging scientific theory. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mintrick (talk • contribs) 20:28, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - It already has a couple solid references (notable) and could provide data important to our future understanding of cosmology (important) - Jrissman (talk) 22:07, 28 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.