Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darken (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Seeing as Atlantic306's arguments have not been contested in detail Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:44, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

Darken (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't seem to be a notable film. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 19:29, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 19:34, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 19:34, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 19:34, 4 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - I was surprised, given notable performers, but it doesn't seem to have any reviews from reliable sources. Testing the long list of reviews on ImDB took a while, but no joy there. Thus failure of WP:NFILM. No single obvious redirect target, so delete for now. Nosebagbear (talk) 22:35, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep as Rotten Tomatoes here lists reviews in multiple reliable sources such as Globe and Mail, National Post and Now Toronto so WP:NFILM is passed Atlantic306 (talk) 22:45, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
 * , add it to the article? --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 09:31, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - I am now unbelievably confused - I clicked this link and nothing came up. Nor were helpful reviews coming up in a before check. It's probably me starting into a horror film. In any case, NFILM would indeed seem to be passed Nosebagbear (talk) 22:48, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. This certainly does need improvement, but per Atlantic 306 it definitely has reviews in notable publications. Bearcat (talk) 14:52, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not meet WP:NFO, not widely distributed or won awards or historically notable or any other criteria - YouTube as a citation, seriously? - Epinoia (talk) 03:23, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
 * - we aren't talking about the in article sources. What about the reviews given by Atlantic, which would satisfy criterion 1 Nosebagbear (talk) 08:20, 10 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.