Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darkestville Castle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus appears to be that these sources are not adequate; a source needs to have a reputation for fact checking and accuracy before it can be used Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:22, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Darkestville Castle

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems to fail WP:GNG, sources are not reliable and doesn't appear to be notable. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 05:48, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:00, 20 September 2017 (UTC)


 * A review of the sources at WP:VG/RS finds no-or-few sources. This is a delete as failing the WP:GNG. --Izno (talk) 11:42, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per lack of sources. GetSomeUtah (talk) 22:36, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Because of what? I used a lot of resources and most of them have a strong foundation. In addition, I added a few more sources, if those are not enough for you. [User:OldGamer|OldGamer]] (talk) 14:36, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Can you show the sources you have used are reliable, secondary sources? Most of them do not appear to be; maybe you can help us understand if some are. --Izno (talk) 14:56, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, fails WP:GNG. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 18:49, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry. But I don't inderstand that kind of sources do you need? IMDB, Gamasutra, Metacritic, Steam, a lot of video games media this is not enough for you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by OldGamer (talk • contribs)
 * These sources are not obviously reliable, meaning they do not obviously have a reputation for publishing factual information. The majority also are not secondary, meaning they are not transforming our understanding of the game. --Izno (talk) 12:20, 27 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.