Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darkwoods


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 04:52, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Darkwoods

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nothing more than rather trivial mentions. Not notable. Insulam Simia (talk) 12:29, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:42, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:43, 3 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete doesn't seem to be notable. OSborn arfcontribs. 18:14, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:07, 12 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete, fails WP:GNG. Ansh666 03:26, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. There just isn't anything out there to show that this niche game is ultimately notable. It was re-released in a compilation set, but just getting a release in a "best of" set isn't really anything that would show notability unless the compilation set itself had some level of notability. Shareware collections very rarely get that level of notability, partially because just about anyone can put those together. It's not like it's Ken Williams putting out a collection of games that he thought were extraordinary. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   03:44, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.