Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darlings of Chelsea


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 14:59, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Darlings of Chelsea

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article subject fails WP:MUSIC guidelines for notability. See here for specific details on what counts as notable for a musical act. Mr Pyles (talk) 00:17, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 7 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. I found the following coverage which is approaching enough to establish notability:, , , --Michig (talk) 19:16, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article clearly meets WP:BAND. There should be no question per WikiProject Albums/Sources (citations from Exclaim! and ChartAttack).  However, keep open if you like, I always add citations from others that I didn't find:  thanks Michig (talk).  User:Paul Erik will problably swoop through and add more after me!  Argolin (talk) 09:13, 8 January 2012 (UTC)  I forgot to add WP:BAND #6 also applies.  Argolin (talk) 09:17, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Exclaim! and ChartAttack coverage indicates notability. 86.44.31.213 (talk) 02:41, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per above; subject meets criterion 1 of WP:BAND.  Gongshow  Talk 18:19, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Sufficient indicia of notability, per wp standards.--Epeefleche (talk) 07:35, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.