Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darom

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Transwiki all four articles to Wiktionary. Deathphoenix 01:08, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Darom
I'm not convinced this article and its cohorts Maarav, Mizrach, and Tzafon are really encyclopedic. My gut says transwiki to Wiktionary, but maybe the articles are a little too long to be dictionary definitions. --Angr 06:42, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, dictionary definitions. Megan1967 07:02, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Wiktionary Kappa 08:52, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Transwiki all four to Wiktionary. Rossami (talk) 00:34, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Transwiki all four. They don't belong here, and the good folks at Wiktionary can edit them down if they think they're too long. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 09:50, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * The article is only long because it comprises multiple dictionary entries. The first paragraph is a dictionary entry for darom/&, the second paragraph is a dictionary entry for negba, and the third paragraph is a dictionary entry for Ha-darom/&.  The other three articles are the same.  Wiktionary all four. Uncle G 21:20, 2005 Mar 4 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.