Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darrell Knoch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  12:09, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Darrell Knoch

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Standard promotional biography of a "real estate authority" and "coach", created by a WP:SPA, edited by an IP that geolocates to the subject's home town, and based entirely on primary, unreliable and press release sources. Google finds more of the same but nothing I would consider to be evidence of meeting WP:GNG. Guy (help!) 09:27, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:19, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:19, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:19, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:19, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:20, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:20, 24 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Lacks the significant independent coverage to meet the GNG. Buying properties is not a claim to notability and there's no supporting evidence. "Coach", "entreprenure", "authority" are all weasel words with no definite meaning and are used to hide the fact that there's no achievements that show notability.Sandals1 (talk) 17:51, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Once you get past the WP:REFBOMBing it is clear that there isn't enough substantial independent sourcing to demonstrate WP:GNG. Best, GPL93 (talk) 22:34, 28 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.