Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darren Bartsch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 00:21, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Darren Bartsch

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Never played an AFL game. Claim to fame is being drafted by four different clubs during his career but never making the cut. Played semi professionally in the SANFL but didn't do anything remotely spectacular. Fails WP:ATHLETE. Jevansen (talk) 08:00, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason. These players have been delisted without making an AFL appearance:


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  —Grahame (talk) 03:28, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete All, as failing WP:ATHLETE, unless evidence can be turned up that any of them did play in top flight of the AFL. Lankiveil (speak to me) 04:01, 4 October 2009 (UTC).
 * Keep Bartsch & Veale, Not sure about Willoughby, Delete or redirect the rest.  WP:GNG outranks  WP:ATHLETE, and those two's specific & peculiar draft history provides that.  Willoughby's stunt/acting work needs more investigation.The-Pope (talk) 04:29, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom and Lankiveil. Orderinchaos 04:43, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete all. Draftees who do not make the first team fail WP:ATHLETE. WWGB (talk) 08:30, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete all. What is up with all these athlete articles for players who apparently didn't actually compete? Who cares about this stuff? Fails WP:ATHLETE... all of them. Lara  18:14, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. What's up with all these editors not understanding that the general notability guideline outranks WP:ATHLETE.  I didn't realise that this was ProAthletesOnlyPedia. Is this just a warmup for the new draftee articles in two-months time?The-Pope (talk) 14:36, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.