Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darren Conquest


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 04:09, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Darren Conquest

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Not notable, regardless of the number of refs, most of which do not cover him. No GNews hits. GregJackP  Boomer!   03:44, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete I had thought to speedy this, but the claims seemed notable so I BLP-prodded. Refs appeared, so I removed the prod and tagged. To my shame, I didn't actually check the refs. Well done GregJackP  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  05:22, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Interesting list of references that have nothing to do with the subject and or unquestionably fails WP:RS. Non-notable and for that matter no indication that it's not a hoax. KTC (talk) 10:37, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:02, 22 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - No picture, no infobox, no headings or subheadings, no real biography. Simply a few facts about the man thrown onto a page in fifteen minutes with no thought or consideration. An article I created called Bluetongue Lizard (mythology) is very short, but that alone took me an hour. The fact that there aren't even proper bulletpoints tells you something right off the bat, not to mention that the bulletpoints are used only once, when it would have been acceptible three times. Brambleberry of RiverClan Chat ♠ Watch 16:25, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails notability criteria needed for article. As noted, most sources offered do not mention the subject and while a search of the sites mentioned did bring up two mentions of the subject (and the references amended to point to the correct web pages), they didn't really go very far in establishing general notability, apart from the obvious problem that they would be primary sources anyway. FlowerpotmaN &middot;( t ) 20:34, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete It appears to be a 'joke.'  I've just reverted a link to it by User talk:203.189.146.231 JRPG (talk) 20:03, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.