Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darren Kitchen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-01-03 08:06Z 

Darren Kitchen

 * — (View AfD)
 * — (View AfD)

Non-notable webshow host, of which the show was previously speedy deleted under G11 and was moved to a userpage for revision (see further comments). skrshawk 15:04, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

I am also nominating the associated article Wess Tobler for deletion. He is a co-host of Hak.5 and has no other claim to notability besides his association with the show. skrshawk 15:16, 24 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment. While I don't think these articles should remain in the main namespace (or I wouldn't have nominated them), I could understand an argument for the mention of these people in an encyclopedic Hak.5 article if one is created. I am not convinced that they have notability outside of the webcast and until such time as they do separate articles are not warranted. skrshawk 15:26, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete both - non notable per WP:BIO. I can't find much about this person through Google except for his work with the Hak5 show. The same applies to Wess Tobler. Jayden54 18:10, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks,


 * Delete both No assertion of notability for Wess Tobler, and only minimal for Darren Kitchen. Half of the latter's article is devoted to his pratfalls, and the last time I checked masochistic slapstick wasn't included in WP:BIO. Caknuck 16:33, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, entirely nn.  Dei zio  talk 01:07, 30 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.