Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darren M. Jackson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Mayalld (talk) 11:12, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Darren M. Jackson

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No (at least online) reliable sources with any significant coverage of the subject. Second nomination, previous here. -- aktsu (t / c) 08:38, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I nominated this at the original AFD, and post that worked with the main contributor to establish sourcing. The fact that the sources are not available online is not a reason to delete. I've seen copies of several of the sources, and can vouch for their existence. Mayalld (talk) 09:29, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I AfD'd questioning his notability, not just because of unavailable sources. (Should I clarify that above? I was assuming it was implied when nominating). Anyway, from what you saw, was he the subject of significant coverage in those articles? -- aktsu (t / c) 10:50, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes. He was the principal subject of a couple of articles. That amounts to significant coverage in my book. Mayalld (talk) 11:00, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Can I ask what they were about? He doesn't seem to have accomplished anything notable? Anyway, I'll withdraw since you can vouch for the articles. -- aktsu (t / c) 11:09, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * They were about his MMA fights. Can't recall more, and I no longer have the scans. Mayalld (talk) 11:11, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep. He had his own article in a magazine. I think that's significant coverage enough. Theymos (talk) 10:59, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Withdraw - Per Mayalld. -- aktsu  (t / c) 11:09, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.