Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darryl Isaacs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:28, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Darryl Isaacs

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The article lacks enough context and majorly highlights the perfections of the person in mention. This is not from a neutral point of view Fredabila (talk) 13:55, 18 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete Forbes contributor piece, rest is all local coverage, talking about the quirky commercials he makes. Certainly odd, but not seeing notability beyond the other hundreds of such lawyers in the US that all make commercials. Oaktree b (talk) 13:59, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  11:51, 26 September 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: giving it one more week, borderline no consensus leaning delete Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yamamoto Ichiro (talk) 14:44, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:37, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep  The subject has had a song by a notable rapper written about him and gone viral/had his business go viral with Superbowl commercials. Additionally, involving an individual's philanthropy in an article is hardly calling them "perfect" and the language of the initial deletion nomination feels charged/biased itself.Captbloodrock (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 14:49, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
 * KeepThis is the lawyer that Jack Harlow wrote a well-known song about, he literally mentions him by name. Also, not all of the coverage for him is local; the A/V Club did an article about his Super Bowl commercial as well-- https://www.avclub.com/all-other-super-bowl-commercials-pale-in-comparison-to-1841449145 Anatomyoffear (talk) 16:28, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * For what it's worth, since my first draft of the article I've included more thorough sources from reliable outlets, as well as citing a news story that occurred a few days later in which the subject became the sponsor of a major college sports team. The Wikipedian who nominated the article also appears to have some sour grapes over their own autobiographical article being deleted a few times, and based on the tone of their nomination for deletion I feel it was made in less than good faith.Captbloodrock (talk) 16:15, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Have added a few more sources to establish notability, including an article from the Australian Business Journal. I've brought this up a few times now and it hasn't been addressed but I feel it's worth pointing out again I feel the initial nomination was made in bad faith and that we shouldn't even be in an AFD discussion at this point.Captbloodrock (talk) 16:27, 4 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep. The article includes adequate references. Local coverage is acceptable for biographies. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 16:35, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Subject meets notability criteria; article is adequately cited.EEBowen (talk) 17:21, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. There is enough significant coverage to pass WP:BASIC.4meter4 (talk) 18:02, 4 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.