Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darshan Singh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge relevant content to Van Tuong Nguyen. Beeblebrox (talk) 04:02, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Darshan Singh

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Darshan Singh is only mentioned in primary sources, namely news sources, and only respect to a single event, namely the execution of Van Tuong Nguyen. He does not meet the general notability standard, nor the specific one for people, because of lack of coverage in secondary sources. See also People notable only for one event. Request Deletion Bejnar (talk) 06:51, 24 January 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:29, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:41, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge - I think the guy has some notability, maybe just enough to pass the WP:GNG (though maybe not). But his notability only really arises from the controversy over Van Tuong Nguyen, which conflicts with WP:BLP1E. I think he may be worth a mention (not too big a mention) at Van Tuong Nguyen, but not a whole article. Spizzilizounge,   (I am Czar of all Russias!)  12:13, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Mention in [[Van Tuong Nguyen as suggested by User:Spongefrog.  850 hangings is more than one event (even though the article focuses mainly on the one), but even then he is just doing his job - admittedly an unusual one, but having an unusual job isn't a criteria for notability as far as I can judge.  Wikipeterproject (talk) 23:01, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Merge. A paragraph or two at Van Tuong Nguyen should cover all for which this person is notable. Wine Guy   Talk  09:47, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.