Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dartmoor Badgers Protection League


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. SarahStierch (talk) 07:17, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Dartmoor Badgers Protection League

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

clearly fails WP:ORG. Marked for notability 3.5 years ago. No significant sourcing. LibStar (talk) 10:25, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:36, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:36, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:36, 14 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep, advocacy group with 2 decades of history, turns up in some book searches. For example http://books.google.com/books?id=9G0TAQAAMAAJ p. 47; "A massive protest was organised resulting in the formation of the Dartmoor Badgers Protection League (DBPL),..." --Soman (talk) 12:41, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
 * one 1 line mention in a book is hardly significant coverage. If it existed for 20 years you'd expect lots of coverage. LibStar (talk) 13:09, 14 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment -- I see there are several mentions of it on the Internet. One says that it became defunct in 2002.  The others seem to be mere blogs.  I suspect that this was a very small group of enthusiasts, and probably NN.   Peterkingiron (talk) 23:24, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 20:28, 22 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete no evidence of significant coverage in independent sources. —me_and 14:46, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. A passing reference in 1 book and some blogs may prove its existence, not notability. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:54, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.