Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darwin's World


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 02:23, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Darwin's World
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

After good faith searches have been unable to find any coverage whatsoever in reliable sources. Even Amazon.com doesn't have a review under it's product description--a rarity. The significant coverage non-reliable sources is limited as well. There is not a single hit for this in Google News Bongo  matic  03:33, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 
 * Neutral Reviews found . I don't know how prominent the Ennie nomination makes it. Ray (talk) 14:45, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —  Aitias   // discussion 00:04, 7 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. An Ennie award would be somewhat notable, in RPG circles, but the nomination doesn't mean much.  On the other hand, RPGNet reviews are sufficient for WP:N and WP:V.  (RPGNet will review almost any RPG-related longer work, but they do give in-depth coverage and they are independent, so I think we have to agree the core policies are met if one extra source exists; which, in this case, it does.)-- S Marshall   Talk / Cont  01:03, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Insufficient notability to meet inclusion guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:46, 8 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.