Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darwin Sayonara


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete.  Ѕandahl 02:14, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Darwin Sayonara

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This appears to be a non-notable book. The article does not demonstrate that the book meets any of the notability criteria at WP:BK and a Google search doesn't provide any reliable sources. Nick Dowling (talk) 05:02, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.   —Nick Dowling (talk) 05:02, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak delete This book exists here but it doesn't appear very notable. All the hits are from booksellers. Artene50 (talk) 09:00, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak delete per Artene. -- GarbageCollection - !Collect 13:56, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. I found enough links   to verify it's existence, but nothing with enough critical commentary to expand it even remotely. Kevin (talk) 22:47, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, exists, but would not appear to meet any of the WP:BK notability criteria. Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:57, 2 June 2008 (UTC).
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:25, 2 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment - oggle wouldnt have anything anyway - nla has one entry - the book itself- however boolarong is a self publish unit who dont have him on their site anymore - anyone with enough clout could add the all the links mentioed above - and some articles could be saved by them - even if it is low on eligibility SatuSuro 08:05, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I did spot those links via a Google search before nominating the article (see the search in the nomination) but brief mentions on book sellers websites and the NT library don't come close to meeting the notability criteria at WP:BK, which are pretty restrictive. Nick Dowling (talk) 10:09, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Thanks for clarifying that - and the issue of WP:BK - I shall be somewhat more circumspect on this issue now that the criteria have been pointed out SatuSuro 02:13, 4 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.