Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darwinian network


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:19, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Darwinian network

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article lacks WP:notability DemocraticLuntz (talk) 00:01, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:43, 16 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:TOOSOON. Google scholar lists three publications on this topic but they're all very recent and all by the same people. There's not yet any evidence that people outside this group consider this reformulation to be of any significance. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:52, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:TOOSOON maybe, but I do not expect this to become notable. Seems like a textbook example of fringe legitimate science, where one researcher thinks they are the new Newton but their colleagues just think of their research as an amusing gimmick. Tigraan (talk) 10:29, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.