Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Das Argument


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:15, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Das Argument

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG Umair Aj (talk) 10:08, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:06, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:06, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:06, 6 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep: indexed in Scopus, perhaps also elsewhere (no time right now to check other selective databases). Rather bad article, needs cleanup/expansion per WP:JWG. --Randykitty (talk) 12:14, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per Randykitty. StAnselm (talk) 19:31, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per RK. See also Scopus, IBZ Online, Periodicals Index Online, MLA - Modern Language Association Database, Philosopher's Index. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 19:13, 7 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.