Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Das chess


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 16:23, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Das chess

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No sign of WP:NOTABILITY. Just another chess variant among thousands, and a new one at that, this is currently sourced to the article proposing it at proza.ru, which is an anyone-can-publish platform. External links are all to anyone-can-publish or user-edited sites. Google finds just 5 hits with the name of the game and the last name of the creator, including this page. Nat Gertler (talk) 16:24, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 17:24, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 17:25, 23 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Nothing to show this has the significant independent coverage required to meet WP:GNG.Mdtemp (talk) 19:20, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete All I can find about this are the self-published page on proza.ru, a similarly unsourced article on the Esperanto Wikipedia, and an article on what appears to be a fork of the Russian Wikipedia though not on the actual Russian WP. Not even on chessvariants.org. &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 18:36, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom., no significant independent coverage, fails WP:GNG. --Bejnar (talk) 03:09, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.