Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dasein Executive Search


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete.  Hut 8.5  17:42, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Dasein Executive Search

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )


 * Looks spammy.
 * A previous (now deleted) attempt at the same name was edited largely by User:CitizenNeutral and User:Anc123, and both of these 2 were sockpuppets of Morning277: see Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Morning277. Best check PicardJ, who started the current version.
 * Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:13, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:26, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:26, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 10:32, 31 October 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete: A recruitment agency taking inspiration from Heidegger is unusual but I am not seeing evidence of notability. Reviewing the references provided: the O Tempo item is a routine announcement (see later comment on IMD), the Exame item is a brief Q&A with one of the company's principals, the Infomoney and both Hoje em dia items involve brief quotation from company officials in articles also quoting others in their trade, the Época item is a brief routine announcement and the IMD reference is a deadlink press release (IMD's website now lists another firm and not Dasein for Brazil: ). These aside, I can also see that a piece of their survey research was namechecked in The Economist in 2011. These are all examples of typical business-media coverage for a firm going about its business, but are not the in-depth coverage of the firm itself needed for WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 19:17, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 17:32, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - this is just another recruiting firm. I can't see what's so special, and the sources don't prove anything. It seems to be little more than spam. Bearian (talk) 01:45, 19 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.