Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DataNumen Word Repair


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 03:06, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

DataNumen Word Repair

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Only references are commercial download sites, most of which simply paraphrase the company's own description without additional comment. Does not meet Notability (software) guidelines. I searched for additional sources and found no indication that they exist. Grayfell (talk) 07:49, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:55, 5 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - I couldn't find any significant sources offering independent commentary either. Moswento talky 09:13, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom, software article lacking RS coverage. A search did not reveal any significant RS coverage. Dialectric (talk) 14:45, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - I was the editor that PROD'd the article to begin with, so I agree with what's been said. It's doesn't meet WP:N (software) or any other guideline.  Sources are commercial links and just rephrase the article or vice versa.  Dismas |(talk) 17:12, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - no significant coverage exists to show notability. Liv it ⇑ Eh?/What? 20:20, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.