Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Data - the journal for Negative, Null and Inconclusive results (NNI results)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 09:28, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Data - the journal for Negative, Null and Inconclusive results (NNI results)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This new journal does not even have any papers published in it yet, so it is too soon for it to have met any of the conditions of notability for academic journals. I already tried prodding this but the article creator (who claims on the article talk page to be one of the journal's founders) removed the prod. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:57, 21 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. I could not find any reliable, secondary sources that discuss this journal. This journal may become notable one day, but right now, it is WP:TOOSOON. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 01:26, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete due to lack of independent coverage at this moment; may require a second look in the future. CarnivorousBunny talk 02:18, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Way too soon, also rather promotionally written (not surprising, given the stated COI). Does not meet NJournals or GNG --Randykitty (talk) 10:03, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete for now - I see the interest of the journal's subject (publishing results that are disappointing and that other journals would turn down for something sexier, basically), but it's not notable five days after being announced. In addition, the article has issues like confusing structure, a primary source based explanation of what 'Interest Number' is and why it matters, etc. This isn't really a standard thing to do (I'm clearly going soft), but I have offered to the page's author that I would be happy to be involved in writing an independent article on the topic with their input at some point in the future, provided they can come up with links to independent coverage that make me feel that the article would meet notability criteria. Blythwood (talk) 13:52, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete for now - If the journal will exist in two or three years time, try again.Shisha-Tom (talk) 08:33, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: for now it fails Notability (academic journals). Sam Sailor Talk! 21:06, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NJOURNALSPharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:39, 27 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.