Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Data Protecto


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Missvain (talk) 07:43, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Data Protecto

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Spammy article about a software product. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 14:49, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't see any significant independent sources, just primary sources (own site, press release), wiki-style sites (wikihow) and just blogs and forums, which just don't establish notability.  野狼院ひさし  u/t/c 15:17, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:31, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:31, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Delete No independent sources, written like an advert. I'm not sure whether this qualifies as a speedy delete per CSD G11 but it might qualify because of the nature of the article. Hx7 (talk) 19:25, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.