Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Data theory


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:46, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Data theory

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article (Like System philosophy) has been created to support the personal philosophy of the editor or one of his friends to promote their web site. Editor has also been trying to insert that position on three philosophy articles (Philosophy, Contemporary Philosophy and Modern Philosophy and is edit warring to achieve that. Only reference here is a link to a set of lecture notes.  This is the web site being promoted by all of these edits.  -- Snowded  TALK 06:25, 23 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Snowded you are wrong. There is no external link that leads to the promotion of 3rd party websites. The deletion was inappropriately challenged by an editor who have not done enough research behind his fallacious assumption. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harvard1932 (talk • contribs) 06:28, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete this looks like someone's joke. Curro2 (talk) 14:26, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. --Pfhorrest (talk) 17:48, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. I could not find any reliable, secondary sources that discuss "data theory," as it is described in this article. If the author can provide sources to substantiate the notability of this theory, then I would be happy to change my vote. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 18:59, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:04, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Logic-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:07, 28 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.