Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Databarracks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Sjakkalle (Check!)  14:44, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Databarracks

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Notability not established, this doesn't seem to be an exceptional company in any way. Ged UK (talk) 15:20, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete: G7, as the author has requested deltion on the article talk page. Livitup (talk) 16:25, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * G7 does not apply, there are other substantive contributors. No prejudice to this AFD. – xeno cidic  ( talk ) 16:31, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Oops... I was looking at the article talk page history, not the article history. Doh.  Still seems like a delete to me since there's virtually no content, the content there looks rather spammy, and looking at the edit history, I don't think it's going to go anywhere.  Livitup (talk) 16:47, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - the other contributors trimmed content, so I think a G7 could reasonably be used. Otherwise, delete per nom. PhilKnight (talk) 16:40, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * A number of edits by Marasmusine added content, specifically this section with criticism, but the original author removed it without providing an edit summary. – xeno cidic  ( talk ) 16:44, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I've readded the "critical reception" section; I guess User:Databarracks objected to the unfavourable comments. The PC Pro review was hurredly found but represents one item of independent, reliable, significant coverage. I'm sure anyone interested enough can find further sources to satisfy WP:Notability guidelines, but I'm pretty indifferent. Marasmusine (talk) 16:59, 30 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.