Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Datacentre Unit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 17:56, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Datacentre Unit

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

delete or redirect to datacentre, no reference found for this term, also mention of be specific consulting ldt. seems an advertising. see also in DCU article the acronim definited as [Datacentre Unit]], Be Specific Consulting term for datacentre units Melaen (talk) 19:49, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:44, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. I was tempted to tag this for speedy deletion as lacking context, because the article seems to just string together various bits of pseudo-technical management bollocks-speak without actually enlightening us as to what the subject actually is. If the article was created as an attempt to promote Be Specific Consulting then it is completely counter-productive, as it gives the impression that that company's representatives are incapable of explaining in comprehensible language what services they are offering. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:52, 21 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - as best as I can figure, it is an abstract unit of measurement for capacity planning in a datacentre with the "unit" being various aggregations of infrastructure with an aspect of measurability. However, I can find no reliable soruces covering this concept. -- Whpq (talk) 16:12, 23 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - 'Article' is word salad nonsense -- omit the word "datacenter" as you read the article, you'll see what I mean -- and probably a lame PR attempt from the (I'm sure) fine folks at "Be Specific Consutling." Even if it weren't word salad nonsense, it reads like a definition and is thus more appropriate (again, if not for the fact that it's nonsense) for wiktionary. Delete, delete, delete! A thousand times DELETE! Mtiffany71 (talk) 21:16, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.