Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Datavo Communications


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 18:07, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Datavo Communications

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article about a communications company. No evidence this company is notable. The only source given that even mentions Datavo is a press release, so is not a independent, published, reliable source. The rest are all about PCS1 not Datavo; its possible PCS1 is notable enough to sustain an article, but even that is not clear from these sources. Prod was contested, so bringing here for discussion. Sparthorse (talk) 21:22, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment: This article has been previously deleted; see Articles for deletion/Datavo. Also note that Datavo is salted due to multiple creation/speedy deletion cycles. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 22:20, 22 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment I origionally accepted this submission via Articles for Creation, as I felt the current sourcing was enough to establish the subject's notability. Currently, there doesn't appear to be any more reliable sources. If the discussion results in delete, can the closing admin please userfy the article, so that once the company does meet the notability guidelines, the author doesn't have to start entirely over. Alpha_Quadrant    (talk)  22:41, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:26, 22 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - No coverage in independent reliable sources. Most of the sourcing in the article is about PCS1, and even that sourcing is mostly in unreliable sources.  I can find nothing but more press releases in my own search. Considering the state of the sourcing, I don't see how userfying would be helpful as it appears this company is not even borderline on the notability. -- Whpq (talk) 15:55, 23 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Note - Editor At4470 has placed comment on Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Datavo Communications. I've left him/her a note that the discussion is here, but other editors should review the comments on the talk page. -- Whpq (talk) 17:33, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, and check to see who created the previous article(s) for this company. Make sure current creator is not a sockpuppet. creator is a SPA, of course, but may be well intentioned, if not WP savvy. PS, oh yes, absolutely no evidence for notability, and this company has a nice, unique character string for a name. if that name plus a fan/promoter cannot find refs, there arent any.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt as repeatedly re-created content. A persistent spammer. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 20:55, 29 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Note - I have no problem that this page will be deleted, but before accusing for spam or anything else please double check the history of this page why it is been recreated and how it come to a subject of deleting, and if you will come to conclusion that something been done incorrectly ,as a spam or this way or other the outer or the company tithe to any spa or any other page/company so please delete it. My believe that if you comparing Datavo to any other privately held telecom company that have a page in Wiki, Datavo is not less notable then the rest(don’t try to compare to AT&T because it is not apple to apple).--At4470 (talk) 22:15, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.