Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dates of Chinese Economy in Wartimes(1937-44)

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was ambiguous.

Since the discussion, several people have labored to make the content of this article more intelligible. With those edits, I am going to call this as a "merge" decision. The destination of the merge is, however, unclear. I am going to temporarily point the article to Economy of China but please see my comments on the Talk page. Rossami (talk) 5 July 2005 23:35 (UTC)

Dates of Chinese Economy in Wartimes(1937-44)
I see no reason for this page to exist. There is nothing even close to this title anywhere else on Wikipedia. The English is terrible. Only one article links here. Just taking up space Woohookitty 07:03, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: The writing is not proficient, but the reason for deletion is the unusable title, which seems to imply that the article is about the economy of producing dates.  There are other places with the information, Economy of China being one, but this term is not going to be sought, so a redirect isn't called for. Geogre 19:25, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not written in the English language. -EDM 21:04, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge I guess the title should be Data of.... This kind of information could be useful in some other article about wartime, but not as is.--Poli 03:06, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete not encyclopedic. JamesBurns 03:53, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, rename (obviously, but a VfD nomination blocks this), clean up, before we have this discussion. Bad English is not a reason to use VfD.  See User:Charles Matthews/Imperial Japan for the state of play on this valued, prolific contributor. Clearly a later merge is an option. Charles Matthews 1 July 2005 09:32 (UTC)
 * Merge to Economy of China or History of China or something like that... I tried to clean it up and to transalte it into intellgible English, but it still does not warrant an article of its own. -- Marcika 4 July 2005 15:43 (UTC)
 * Delete - Article makes my head hurt. --FCYTravis 5 July 2005 07:15 (UTC)


 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.