Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dato' K.M. Rifatuzzaman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was WP:SNOW delete. BD2412 T 22:59, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Dato' K.M. Rifatuzzaman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG, no independent or reliable sources were found. Antila ✉  08:44, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Antila  ✉  08:44, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Antila  ✉  08:44, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

A duplicate article of this article titled K.M. Rifatuzzaman is also proposed for deletion at Articles for deletion/K.M. Rifatuzzaman. ~ Amkgp 💬  16:03, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete — Was on my way to AFD it when I refreshed the page & saw someone already beat me to it. Like already said, subject of the article fails to satisfy either GNG or BASIC. Celestina007 (talk) 08:49, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable person, article is self serving. Donaldd23 (talk) 10:49, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable person, fails to satisfy WP:GNG --SalmanZ (talk) 15:13, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:13, 12 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. I just blocked the creator of this article for undisclosed paid editing. The article is terrible and might be nominated for G11 as well. Even if it turned out that the person was notable, the article as it stands is not acceptable. Note also that an article on the Akhtar Group, by the same creator, was deleted twice in 2015 for being promotional. Drmies (talk) 14:45, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete It's in WP:G11 territory for sure. Best, GPL93 (talk) 19:23, 16 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.