Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Datong Road


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 18:17, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Datong Road

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Only source is an IME, and it is only a side street in Shanghai. —Eat me, I'm a red bean (talk · contribs · email) 13:01, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep: Have added another source, appears to have some significant coverage by at least one reliable source. --Rubbish computer 14:45, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete—recently added source does not meet WP:GNG as it cannot meet the definition of "significant coverage" about this road as it is about computer hacking.  Imzadi 1979  →   00:45, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 2 October 2015 (UTC)


 * delete no indication why or how the street is notable. It's easy to find mentions of such streets, but it needs in depth coverage, and it should be clear why it is notable.-- JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 19:29, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lack of in depth coverage is showing that this place is not notable.  Rcsprinter123    (chatter)  19:30, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per nom and above editors. Can't find any significant coverage, only mentions showing the road exists. Fails WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:18, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete no notability. --Rschen7754 21:26, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Article states "One of thousands" so what makes this road so special out of a thousand others in China ? .... Exactly nothing special about it, Fails GNG . – Davey 2010 Talk 02:28, 5 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.