Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Datu Puti


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 23:56, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Datu Puti

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unremarkable condiment. If the manufacturer had an article, I'd suggest a redirect of a mertge. But they don't. TheLongTone (talk) 16:32, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:53, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:53, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - brand dominates the Philippine market when it comes to soy sauce and cane vinegar, similar to say, Heinz ketchup in the US. It's also the brand most commonly found in Filipino or Asian specialty stores abroad. Particularly since both are commonly used in Filipino dishes. Note descriptors used in the following secondary sources, "popular", "market leader", "iconic", etc.; CNN particularly, says "Datu Puti is synonymous with vinegar in the Philippines": Inquirer, CNN, ABS-CBN News, Adobo Magazine, Inquirer, GMA News, Rappler, PhilStar, Interaksyon, Daily Tribune, Inquirer, Malaya, Epicurious, The Telegram, New Times, Interaksyon, Business Mirror, Selangor Times, LA Times, Metro.uk.-- O BSIDIAN  †  S OUL  21:58, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:52, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Thanks to for identifying more than enough reliable sources to establish notability. Cullen328   Let's discuss it  04:36, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Somewhat to my surprise, there are enough usable sources.  DGG ( talk ) 06:11, 13 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.