Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Davao Eagle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:08, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Davao Eagle

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Paid promotion article which fails WP:GNG and WP:WEB. Another non-notable paid article by the same user was apparently deleted here but this one was missed it seems. None of the references in the article is enough for notability, some of them are primary sources, the website itself, and others either has only a name mention or does not have anything relevant, there is zero SIGCOV, my WP:BEFORE search could not find any SIGCOV to justify notability as well. Tehonk (talk) 21:22, 2 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete. I agree: there's no there there. No in-depth coverage, nothing inherently or proven notable. Drmies (talk) 02:06, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment if deleted then can this be redirected to Davao Eagles as a plausible typo? Never heard of this website. -- Lenticel ( talk ) 07:22, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment. Doesn't seem related to the MBL team. --- Tito Pao (talk) 11:16, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Websites,  and Philippines.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:19, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Deleteper nom lacks indepth coevrage fails WP:GNG and WP:WEB.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:51, 9 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.