Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Bradley Photography


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:58, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Dave Bradley Photography

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This article fails to meet the requirements of WP:BIO and appears to be an advert. The article was created by the WP:SPA User:Corsairf4u and so a likely conflict of interest appears to apply. The article has been tagged as an advert for a year with no improvement and no independent sources are likely to be added to substantiate notability. Ash (talk) 08:27, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this photographer. Joe Chill (talk) 23:50, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - no Google news hits, doesn't appear to pass WP:CREATIVE. It is also written in a rather spammy fashion.   Cocytus   [»talk«]  03:01, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Close to A7 speedy delete; this appears to be close to spam, and definitely not notable. Nyttend (talk) 17:53, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.