Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Crenshaw


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:35, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Dave Crenshaw

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article was created by an undisclosed paid editor and has been further expanded by his sockpuppets. I believe that this article needs to be examined to determine if it's worth keeping and/or if it needs to be adjusted significantly. only (talk) 17:26, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:04, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:05, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:36, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:36, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~   {talk}  00:36, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment- The problem in this page is not notability, it easily pass WP:GNG, it requires a clean-up added by the socks. It will be better to work on neutrality instead of discussing at WP:AFD, it is increasing workload for admins here which can be avoided. 157.37.243.101 (talk) 04:43, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:36, 10 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.