Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Miller (software developer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:02, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Dave Miller (software developer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable individual. References are to an automated statistics site, non-independent sites (Mozilla, Bugzilla), and a blog. No significant coverage of this individual from independent secondary sources. "We require 'significant coverage' in reliable sources so that we can actually write a whole article, rather than half a paragraph or a definition of that topic. If only a few sentences could be written and supported by sources about the subject, that subject does not qualify for a separate page, but should instead be merged into an article about a larger topic or relevant list." This article has existed for almost a decade, has had a notability warning for 2 years, and has still failed to get beyond the few sentences stage. Mozilla and Bugzilla are the notable topics here, not the individual. Chris Bainbridge (talk) 17:34, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 26 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Did a few searches; no evidence of notability. -Sigeng (talk) 08:31, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:52, 3 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete: There does not appear to be enough to demonstrate individual notability, independent of roles. AllyD (talk) 05:39, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:Notability. Malke 2010 (talk) 21:04, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.