Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Ullrich


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Sources identified show notability. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  11:03, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Dave Ullrich

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Does not meet WP:MUSIC. His notability is entirely derived from the bands he is in. Claritas (talk) 09:08, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose. The Canadian music group has not really had a chance to establish his notability.  The template  is missing from his discussion page.  Argolin (talk) 12:09, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm not debating the notability of his group, but of himself. He doesn't seem to be notable enough outside the bands he's in to warrant an independent article. Claritas (talk) 12:11, 8 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:59, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I've said nothing of his group. The group I mention is the Canadian music group.  In fact, if you go to this page WikiProject Canadian music/Unreferenced BLPs Dave Ullrich is missing.  He is missing from this unreferenced BLP page because the template  is missing from his discussion page.  Argolin (talk) 18:21, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I misunderstood. I realise now that you mean WikiProject Canada. Claritas (talk) 18:25, 8 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Part of the confusion rests with me. Bantering about terms like the Canadian music group is too close to the Category:Canadian musical groups (and is what the Canadian banner template previously named us).  I should have linked the Unreferenced BLPs to my first post in opposition to this deletion.
 * With all that said:


 * 1) Oppose.  WikiProject Canadian music has signed up for the User:DASHBot/Wikiprojects.  The bot has only started reporting to the Canadian music project very recently (within weeks).  The article is absent from Unreferenced BLPs.
 * 2) Oppose. Without the banner template  placed properly on the discussion/talk page, it dosen't exist as an article for the Canadian music project.  See our page:  stats.  Argolin (talk) 06:57, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Striking second and third !votes by a single user to avoid confusion Heather (talk) 22:07, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:11, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Redirect to The Inbreds, everything worth keeping is already there (no sign of individual notability for Egger. duffbeerforme (talk)
 * Keep – I've added multiple sources just now. Ullrich is a founding member of "one of the foremost bands emerging from the Canadian indie scene of the '90s" (says Allmusic), but in the 2000s has become more known as the founder of Zunior, to the point that articles such as this don't even mention his connection to the Inbreds when they interview him. He's been interviewed on national radio for his Zunior work. Articles such as the ones I added from Exclaim! and from the National Post are about him, not about the Inbreds. He's notable enough for a separate article. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 16:50, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.