Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Vescio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep: Withdrawn by nominator. I don't know how I could've made as simple a mistake as misreading the Google results, but I did. My bad. Though this article still needs some TLC, in my opinion, but that's not grounds for deletion. I'm closing this Speedy keep criterion 1; if anyone who's already contributed to this discussion feels there's reason to continue nonetheless, they should feel free to revert me, provided they leave a note explaining this withdrawal. (non-admin closure)  — PinkAmpers   &#38;   ( Je vous invite à me parler )  19:52, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Dave Vescio

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not demonstrate any notability that would satisfy WP:CREATIVE or any other applicable set of criteria. <1,000 GHits, which in my book almost always merits deletion when it comes to biographies.  — PinkAmpers   &#38;   ( Je vous invite à me parler )  13:19, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep IMDb lists 50+ film credits. I don't believe anyone who's appeared in 50 films isn't notable. Yahoo Movies has quite a lenghty interview, for example.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 13:27, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * am quite puzzled by your logic, appearing in a large number of films isn't a reason to keep unless those films are notable surely?  nonsense  ferret  19:50, 19 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment its a marginal one for me - I think the correct policy to use is WP:NACTOR and I would say he doesn't seem to meet condition 2 or 3 in having neither a huge fan base, nor making a unique contribution. The question is then, does he meet 1. Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. - I don't personally recognise any of the films so question whether they are notable, but then I do appreciate that they may be notable within the horror genre.  I probably am wavering towards NN, but don't feel strongly enough to vote.   nonsense  ferret  15:42, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Lugnuts. Zia Khan 17:48, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep In my opinion the article meets all of the conditions. It is not Offensive or damaging to the person it is about. He is clearly worthy of note being that he has appeared in such a large number of films and there do not seem to be any other reasons for it's removal either — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rachellains (talk • contribs) 19:28, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.