Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Weasel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  04:52, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Dave Weasel
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

New article created by SPA. Article is about a little-known comedian with a satire website that has once or twice created a WP:SENSATION as an individual gag is mentioned in the Daily Mail or on Buzzfeed. Notability tag has been repeatedly removed from page during period when I attempted to work with creator by advising him on what reliable sourcing is. Delete as WP:PROMO E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:55, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Nominating both comedian and his website. E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:21, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note that a 2nd SPA removed tags for notability, sourcing .E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:16, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

— Yeahimadethis (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. is the article creator.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:01, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - I disagree. I posted several references (with proper coding, sorry about that before). His allmusic.com page is listed, a credential for musicians, his verified artist profile on Spotify and his verified Facebook comedian page. All show notability. Any further instruction or advice is welcomed. I'm a newbie at Wikipedia editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yeahimadethis (talk • contribs) 19:03, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - Seems sufficiently well documented and notable comedian to me.--DThomsen8 (talk) 19:51, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:11, 7 June 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  06:44, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - I'm sympathetic to the nominator... I'm finding that the majority of sources provided are not independant of the subject, or are routine coverage. That said, #7 on the billboard chart is nothing to sneer at, and may be a notability claim in and of itself.  I'm also not as dismissive of a daily mail article... I understand WP:SENSATION, but on the other hand, individual sensations are what comedians in general tend to be noted for, and in my opinion, can add weight to corroborate (although not completely establish) notability.  So the billboard chart, plus the daily mail... it's barely barely enough to nudge past my notability threshold.  Neither source alone would do it for me, but the sum total of both looks ok.  That said, it's right on the borderline, and I wouldn't object too hard if other wikipedians thought it wasn't enough. Fieari (talk) 07:10, 14 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.