Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daver campbell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 05:57, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Daver campbell

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Has been speedied & recreated three times so far; however this version does make an assertion of notability so bringing it here. —  iride  scent  00:54, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. There is enough assertion of notability to keep this article with an tag. --Blanchardb 01:08, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * What assertion? There are thousands and thousand of models. Just open up any catelog from Sears or any other clothing type store and it will be filled with models. TJ Spyke 05:35, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't see anything suggesting this guy isn't just another model. JuJube 01:40, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:BIO. Google turned up no reliable secondary sources to establish notability. Doctorfluffy 02:26, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as above - nothing but myspace links. digitalemotion  02:43, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong and speedy delete per WP:CSD, per WP:COI, per WP:SOAP, WP:RS. Liberally add salt to this namespace as well as the correctly capitalised namespace. Ohconfucius 03:48, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing to indicate what makes him more notable than any other model (I could randomly pick a person from a store advertisement catelog and they would be just as notable). TJ Spyke 05:35, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt. Article about a non notable model called Coleto Cargill, which was created by User:Ccargill. Crazysuit 06:11, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and WP:SALT as above. – Mike . lifeguard  &#124; @en.wb 03:58, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete no sign of notability. Edward321 —Preceding comment was added at 04:33, 10 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.