Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David A. Fein


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:55, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

David A. Fein

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not meeting GNG. appears to have been copy pasted using a template, without removing the template pieces. Born "Birthdate" and the like (with square brackets we can't reproduce here due to wiki formatting)." David A. Fein was born in [City of Birth] on [Birthdate], to [Parents] who were [Parent’s Occupations]. *Only include if relevant* " Blatantly promotional. No sources of any kind found. Oaktree b (talk) 04:32, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Medicine,  and New Jersey.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:07, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Beyond the problems noted in the nomination, of being a promotional half-filled-out template (I can only imagine that if this was paid editing, then someone didn't get their money's worth), he appears to have few or no academic publications (so no chance of WP:PROF) and no in-depth coverage in independent reliable sources (so no WP:GNG). I did find one local news source quoting him, but it appears to be both non-in-depth and too promotional to count as independent and reliable enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 08:21, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
 * David, I am new to using Wikipedia and did not realize that this article had been published already. I can assure you that the article was not created using a template, but I have removed the portions that may appear to have been copy-pasted. I will also continue to add independent, in-depth, reliable sources. GTLPhD (talk) 15:04, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete None of the refs seem to be significant coverage of the subject and most do not appear to be reliable. Best, GPL93 (talk) 20:41, 2 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.