Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David A Milman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 01:37, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

David A Milman

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unable to find any significant coverage in reliable, independent sources beyond passing mention in the context of Rescuecom. Bongo  matic  20:40, 30 August 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  21:21, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, and also because article resembles a poorly written vanity piece. --khfan93 (t) (c) 20:51, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Please review additional independent references posted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Moevillecitizen (talk • contribs) 21:17, 30 August 2010 (UTC)  — Moevillecitizen (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Please review additional independent references posted, possible "vanity" language resolvedMoevillecitizen (talk) 21:31, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, or Merge to Rescuecom. Nothing in this article suggests he is personally notable. Three "reliable source" references are provided, but the Fox News one merely quotes him among other in an article about a computer virus; I can't find any mention of him at all in the MSNBC reference; he does seem to have appeared on CNBC once as an expert; not enough. All the other references appear to be blogs and press releases. --MelanieN (talk) 19:46, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete per MelanieN. Joaquin008  ( talk ) 15:06, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I do not consider the references given show notability  DGG ( talk ) 01:00, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.