Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Amerland


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 11:49, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

David Amerland

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fails WP:CREATIVE. Extremely minor journalist/author with no evidence of notability, and no third-party sources at all. Delete as nominator. Tevildo (talk) 20:49, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. I note also that a Google search reveals that he describes himself elsewhere on-line as an "SEO expert", and the only major editing to this article has been done by User:David63styx and User:Damersun, usernames that bear a distinct similarity to that of Mr Amerland.  Do I detect WP:COI as additional grounds for deletion? Tevildo (talk) 20:57, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - unreferenced BLP (which I've just tagged as such), and I've been unable to find anything with Google that makes me think we'll be able to source it. I agree with Tevildo that there's more than a whiff of WP:COI about it as well. Scog (talk) 21:08, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - article appears to be self-promotion. No reliable sources to establish notability -- Whpq (talk) 19:31, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.