Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David B. Weinberger


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  08:42, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

David B. Weinberger

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Highest citation count of the subject is 31 (that too a paper co-authored with doctoral adviser). Doesn't passes WP:PROF Solomon7968 19:42, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Solomon7968 19:42, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Solomon7968 19:43, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Solomon7968 19:44, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Oppose Did you review the New Yorker article? If not, we don't know what their coverage is like. We do know what the book The Predictors says: "David Weinberger should be recorded in the annals of finance as the original rocket scientist on Wall Street." The book certainly is not just a passing coverage of Weinberger. He also has an Erdos number of 3. He's not a professor - he's a financial professional, and seems like a notable one to me. II  | (t - c) 23:07, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:12, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:59, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:59, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:18, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete for now and WP:TNT as although how detailed the article may look at first glance, my searches even at scholar found nothing better so feel free to restart this when better. SwisterTwister   talk  05:27, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - At this stage, can't find anything to show they meet the notability guidelines.  Onel 5969  TT me 03:21, 3 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.